4.1 Water Supply & Sewerage
Water is a key driver and is vital to development of Biodiversity, Agriculture, Humans as well as the Economy. With recent experiences across the world and in India, the water scarcity and security is emerging issues. The state of Maharashtra has also faced severe impact of the water scarcity in the recent past. Therefore water management is a crucial step of sustainable development and it also has been made an integral part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Unplanned urban growth and economic development has placed unprecedented pressures on natural resources especially on water. Increasing demand for the water in urban areas such as Nashik highlights the necessity of the overall water management.
4.1.1 Water supply and quality in the campus
There are about 12 water storage tanks within the campus, the capacities are shown below:
Water Storage Capacity at the campus
Sr. No. |
Department |
UGT capacity |
UGT capacity |
No. of times filled |
Water storage/ usage (m3/day) |
1 |
Biotech Building |
20,000.00 |
25,000.00 |
2.00 |
90.00 |
2 |
Office |
50,000.00 |
20,000.00 |
2.00 |
140.00 |
3 |
Girls Hostel |
50,000.00 |
40,000.00 |
2.00 |
180.00 |
4 |
Boys Hostel |
20,000.00 |
20,000.00 |
2.00 |
80.00 |
5 |
Main Building |
0.00 |
25,000.00 |
2.00 |
25,000.00 |
6 |
Annex. Building |
0.00 |
20,000.00 |
2.00 |
40.00 |
|
|
|
Total Water Usage |
580.00 |
Water supply requirements as per National Building Code, 2005
Sr. No. |
Department |
Total Population |
Water Supply for Buildings Other than Residences |
Water Supply for Residential Buildings (Hostels) |
Water requirement (m3/day) |
1 |
Institute (staff) |
422.00 |
45.00 |
0.00 |
25.38 |
2 |
Institute - students |
9,028.00 |
45.00 |
0.00 |
405.00 |
3 |
Girls Hostel |
320.00 |
0.00 |
135.00 |
43.20 |
4 |
Boys Hostel |
120.00 |
0.00 |
135.00 |
20.25 |
5 |
Canteen |
500.00 |
45.00 |
0.00 |
67.50 |
|
Total population |
10,390.00 |
Total water requirement |
561.33 |
Note: This requirement is inclusive of drinking water.
Based on the available data and benchmarking for water supply as per National Building Code (NBC), it can be seen that the campus receives about 18.67 m3 of excess fresh water every day.
Drinking water quality in the campus
No. |
Locations |
DO (mg/l) |
BOD3 (mg/l) |
Chloride (mg/l) |
Total Hardness (mg/l) |
Total Alkalinity (mg/l) |
EC (mS/cm2) |
pH |
TS (mg/l) |
TDS (mg/l) |
TSS (mg/l) |
1 |
Boys Hostel Mess Tap |
8 |
0.4 |
119.28 |
139.98 |
90 |
0.41 |
7.9 |
500 |
100 |
400 |
2 |
Boys Hostel Cooler |
6 |
0.4 |
89.46 |
79.99 |
30 |
0.38 |
7.5 |
2800 |
1800 |
1000 |
3 |
Girls Hostel Under Ground Tank |
6.4 |
1.2 |
82.36 |
82.36 |
30 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
500 |
0 |
500 |
4 |
Girls Hostel Cooler |
7.2 |
1.2 |
88.04 |
93.32 |
80 |
80 |
7.6 |
1200 |
400 |
800 |
5 |
IMRT Well |
4 |
2 |
90.88 |
93.32 |
11 |
0.38 |
7.9 |
300 |
0 |
300 |
6 |
Boat Club Well |
7.6 |
1.6 |
186.02 |
339.96 |
31 |
1.76 |
7.6 |
2200 |
200 |
2000 |
7 |
River |
5.2 |
0.4 |
97.98 |
126.65 |
0 |
0.45 |
8 |
2000 |
300 |
1700 |
8 |
Main Building Cooler |
4.8 |
1.8 |
75.76 |
93.32 |
90 |
0.37 |
6.8 |
500 |
300 |
200 |
9 |
Annex II Under Ground Tank |
6.8 |
0.8 |
180.34 |
386.65 |
100 |
1.66 |
7.5 |
1900 |
500 |
1400 |
10 |
Annex I Over Head Tank |
6.4 |
0.7 |
96.56 |
83.32 |
20 |
1.4 |
7.8 |
1700 |
400 |
1300 |
11 |
Library Open Tap |
6 |
0.8 |
71 |
79.99 |
80 |
0.37 |
7.6 |
4400 |
600 |
3800 |
12 |
Canteen Drinking Water Tap |
2.4 |
0.9 |
93.72 |
99.99 |
10 |
0.38 |
7.7 |
300 |
200 |
100 |
Drinking water standards as per IS 10500:2012 - acceptable limits |
--- |
--- |
250 |
200 |
200 |
--- |
6.5 - 8.5 |
--- |
500 |
--- |
Note:
-
All result values are in mg/l, except pH.
-
These results are not reproducible; the results are subject to water storage & supply conditions on the site.
MPN count of Drinking water quality in the campus
Sample |
10 ml |
1 ml |
0.1 ml |
MPN index |
Colony count |
Potability |
Annex II underground tank |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2400 |
20 |
Non- Potable |
Girls hostel cooler |
5 |
5 |
1 |
350 |
15 |
Non- Potable |
Boat club water |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2400 |
25 |
Non- Potable |
River water sample |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2400 |
30 |
Non- Potable |
Annex I Over head tank |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2400 |
18 |
Non- Potable |
Main Building Cooler |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Potable |
IMRT well sample |
4 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
10 |
Non- Potable |
Boys hostel cooler |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
Potable |
Canteen drinking water |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Potable |
Boys hostel mess |
4 |
1 |
0 |
17 |
8 |
Non- Potable |
Girls hostel underground tank |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Potable |
Library open tank |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
Potable |
It is informed that water supply is taken either from Nashik Municipal Corporation or water is extracted from 2 dug wells within the campus. However due to probable mixing of both the water sources the quality of fresh water has been deteriorated. Therefore it is necessary to have a fresh water treatment system before use including disinfection. Similarly, periodical cleaning of water tanks is very essential. Table No.5 and Table No. 6 suggest that many of the locations the quality of water is NON POTABLE. Therefore immediate actions are required.
4.1.2 Rain water harvesting potential of the campus
The campus buildings possess large terrace areas and paved as well as non paved areas. Currently, none of the buildings have Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) System implemented. The campus has huge potential for RWH (Table No. 7). However, due to close proximity of the river Godawari, the ground water table may be very high and therefore it is necessary to undertake detailed Hydrogeology Survey and then the RWH system should be implemented.
The campus buildings possess large terrace areas and paved as well as non paved areas. Currently, none of the buildings have Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) System implemented. The campus has huge potential for RWH (Table No. 7). However, due to close proximity of the river Godawari, the ground water table may be very high and therefore it is necessary to undertake detailed Hydrogeology Survey and then the RWH system should be implemented.
Figure 2: Schematics of ground water recharge and storage
Rain Water Harvesting potential of the campus
Sr. No. |
Area Type |
Roof top area (sq.m.) |
Rainfall (m) |
Total Rainfall volume (cu. M.) |
Avg. Rainfall volume (cu. M.) / day count |
1 |
Ladies Hostel 1 |
163.76 |
0.62 |
96.45 |
5.79 |
2 |
Ladies Hostel 2 |
165.12 |
0.62 |
97.26 |
5.84 |
3 |
Ladies Hostel 3 |
164.67 |
0.62 |
96.99 |
5.82 |
4 |
Principal Quarter |
281.42 |
0.62 |
165.76 |
9.95 |
5 |
IT centre - Environment dept |
1,039.13 |
0.62 |
612.05 |
36.72 |
6 |
Press Building |
313.85 |
0.62 |
184.86 |
11.09 |
7 |
PG + extension |
1,451.09 |
0.62 |
854.69 |
51.28 |
8 |
KTHM main building + library |
2,759.38 |
0.62 |
1,625.27 |
97.52 |
9 |
Boys Hostel |
669.74 |
0.62 |
394.48 |
23.67 |
Total rain fall volume |
|
3,733.33 |
224.00 |
Note: Avg. Annual Rainfall of 620mm at Nashik city is considered for the calculations
4.1.3 Sewerage Management
Based on the water consumption data and considering about 90% of the water supplied is converted in to the waste water either through the washrooms, chemical laboratories, etc. the campus generated about 522.00 m3 of waste water every day.
It was observed that there is no separate drainage system for collecting and transporting sewage and liquids from chemical laboratories. Currently, a combined drainage systems is placed which carries all the liquid effluent to a sewerage system to the north provided by the Nashik Municipal Corporation.
4.2 Noise Environment
Noise pollution is one of the major environmental issues in India today and most of us are unaware of the hazards it can cause. In India, we all are subjected to some form of loud noises for a considerable amount of time on daily basis as well across the year based on the festive season such as Ganesh Festival, Diwali and others.
Unwarranted sounds such as honking, other vehicular noise, the loudspeakers and not to forget about household noise such as television and music system sounds on daily basis are inevitable. In our country it’s a major perception that happiness can only be expressed by creating loud noises.
Table No. 8 shows implications of Noise on Human Body. Exposure to high levels of noise may cause permanent hearing loss. The repeated exposures to loud noise can lead to permanent tinnitus and/or hearing loss. Furthermore, it may create physical and psychological stress, reduce productivity, and interfere with communication and concentration. The effects of noise induced hearing loss can be profound & can be limiting your ability to hear high frequency sounds, understand speech, and seriously impairing your ability to communicate.
Considerable Implications of Noise on the Human Body
Sr. No. |
Noise Levels in dB |
Health Hazards |
1 |
80 |
Annoying |
2 |
90 |
Hearing Damage |
3 |
95 |
Very Annoying |
4 |
110 |
Stimulation of Skin |
5 |
120 |
Pain Threshold |
6 |
130 – 135 |
Dizziness , Vomiting |
7 |
140 |
Pain in Ear |
8 |
150 |
Significant change in Heart Pulse |
Noise monitoring observations
Sr. No. |
Location |
Minimum Noise Levels dB (A) |
Maximum Noise Levels dB (A) |
Ambient Air Quality Standards
in respect of Noise dB (A),
in accordance with Noise
Pollution (Regulation and Control)
amendment rules, 2000 Silent Zone |
1 |
Spot-Annex 1 Classroom -1 KA111 |
58.3 |
72.3 |
50 |
2 |
Spot-Annex 1 Classroom -2KA214 |
57.6 |
71.4 |
50 |
3 |
Library (Outside) |
52.0 |
57.7 |
50 |
4 |
Library (Inside) |
56.5 |
66.1 |
50 |
5 |
Back Gate |
53.2 |
69.2 |
50 |
6 |
Back Gate Parking |
59.0 |
68.3 |
50 |
7 |
Main Building Porch |
54.5 |
71.1 |
50 |
8 |
Annexe-2 |
64 |
72 |
50 |
9 |
Abhinav School Corner |
56.3 |
73.6 |
50 |
10 |
Boat Club |
50.0 |
63.0 |
50 |
11 |
Zoology Classroom |
50.6 |
69.5 |
50 |
12 |
Boy’s Hostel |
50.6 |
69.5 |
50 |
Note:
-
The readings were taken during the day time. 2. Day time means 06:00 am to 10:00 pm
-
Silent zone comprises of not less than 100 meters around educational institutes
The observations show that all the locations monitored show high level of noise pollution. The causes of noise pollution may be proximity of the main road with high traffic volumes, other buildings such as Abhinav school where variety of noisy activities are conducted the school building and other areas experience high noise levels (max. noise levels observed) as compared to the silent zone standards (day time requirements).
4.3 Plant diversity:
Various manmade activities have wide range of impacts on the surrounding ecosphere, both negative as well as positive. Over the years, KTHM College has undertaken various activities like plantation and beautification of campus through various drives. The campus has good plantations along with well-maintained medicinal plants’ garden; and landscaping. It’s a positive step to reduce its environmental impact. This section provides a detailed list of plant species observed within the campus.
The campus attempts to maintain ecofriendly atmosphere on the campus; the number and variety of plant species helps to maintain eco-friendly ambience. Further, to create eco-friendly awareness among the students college arranges special programmes through which the students get clear idea and importance of trees in life. There are more than 60 perennial plant species have been observed.
Though, the college campus represents good plant diversity, there is large scope to plant more trees, particularly along the fence line of main road where high to very high traffic was noticed.
List of plant species observed in the campus during the field visit
Sr. No. |
Botanical Name |
Local Name |
Habit |
Family |
1 |
Albizia saman |
Rain tree |
Tree |
Mimosaceae |
2 |
Annona squamosa |
Sitaphal |
Shrub |
Annonaceae |
3 |
Azadirachta indica |
Neem |
Tree |
Meliaceae |
4 |
Canna indica |
Canna |
Herb |
Cannaceae |
5 |
Cocos nucifera |
Coconut |
Palm |
Arecaceae |
6 |
Delonix regia |
Gulmohor |
Tree |
Caesalpiniaceae |
7 |
Duranta erecta |
Duranta |
Shrub |
Verbanaceae |
8 |
Erythrina indica |
Pangara |
Tree |
Fabaceae |
9 |
Ficus benjamina |
Ficus |
Tree |
Moraceae |
10 |
Ficus elastica |
Rubber tree |
Tree |
Moraceae |
11 |
Ficus racemosa |
Umbar |
Tree |
Moraceae |
12 |
Leucaena latisiliqua |
Subabhul |
Tree |
Mimosaceae |
13 |
Mangifera indica |
Mango |
Tree |
Anacardiaceae |
14 |
Millingtonia hortensis |
Buch |
Tree |
Bignoniaceae |
15 |
Polyalthia longifolia |
Ashok-Khota |
Tree |
Annonaceae |
16 |
Pseudocalymma alliaceum |
Lasunvel |
Climber |
Bignoniaceae |
17 |
Santalum albam |
Sandalwood |
Tree |
Santalaceae |
18 |
Terminalia catappa |
Jangli Badam |
Tree |
Combretaceae |
19 |
Terminalia muelleri |
Australian Almond |
Tree |
Combretaceae |
20 |
Hibiscus sp. |
Jaswand |
Shrub |
Malvaceae |
21 |
Bougainvillea sp. |
|
vine |
Nyctaginaceae |
22 |
Eucalyptus sp. |
Nilgiri |
Tree |
Myrtaceae |
23 |
Bauhinia sp. |
Kanchan |
Tree |
Fabaceae |
24 |
Bamboo sp. |
Bamboo |
Grass |
Poaceae |
25 |
Tectona grandis |
Sagwan |
Tree |
Lamiaceae |
26 |
Banana sp. |
Kela |
Tree |
Musaceae |
27 |
Peltophorum pterocarpum |
Sonmohor |
Tree |
Caesalpiniaceae |
28 |
Areca sp. |
Supari |
Palm |
Arecaceae |
29 |
Carica papaya |
Papaya |
Tree |
Caricaceae |
30 |
Psidium guajava |
Peru |
Tree |
Myrtaceae |
31 |
Casuarina equisetifolia |
Suru |
Pine |
Casuarinaceae |
32 |
Araucaria sp. |
Chirstmas Tree |
Pine |
Araucariaceae |
33 |
Alstonia scholaris |
Saptaparni |
Tree |
Apocynaceae |
34 |
Magnolia champaca |
Chafa |
Tree |
Magnoliaceae |
35 |
Nerium oleander |
Kanher |
Shrub |
Apocynaceae |
36 |
Caesalpinia pulcherima carnea |
Shankasur |
Small tree |
Caesalpiniaceae |
37 |
Thespesia populnea |
Bhend |
Tree |
Malvaceae |
38 |
Ricinus communis |
Erand |
Herb |
Euphorbiaceae |
39 |
Kigelia africana |
Bramha Dand |
Tree |
Bignoniaceae |
40 |
Grevillea robust |
Silver oak |
Tree |
Proteaceae |
41 |
Calotropis gigantea |
Rui |
Shrub |
Apocynaceae |
42 |
Tabernaemontana sp. |
Tagar |
shrub |
Apocynaceae |
43 |
Murraya koenigii |
Curry Leaf tree |
Tree |
Rutaceae |
List of plant species in the campus provided by Botany Department
Sr. No. |
Botanical name of the plant |
Local Name |
Family |
1 |
Abelomoschus hibiscus L |
Kasturi Bhendi |
Malvaceae |
2 |
Abitulon indicum |
Mudra |
Malvaceae |
3 |
Acacia arabica willd |
Babhul |
Mimosaceae |
4 |
Acacia catechu Prain |
Khair |
Mimosaceae |
5 |
Acacia concinna D.C. |
Shikekai |
Mimosaceae |
6 |
Achyranthus aspera L. |
Aghada |
Amaranthaceae |
7 |
Acorus calamus L |
Vekhand |
Araceae |
8 |
Adansonia digitata L. |
Gorakh Chinch |
Bombacaceae |
9 |
Adhatoda vasica Nees. |
Adulsa |
Acanthaceae |
10 |
Adiantum lunaliatum Bum. |
Hanspadi |
Polypodiaceae |
11 |
Aegle marmelos Corr. |
Bel |
Rutaceae |
12 |
Agave americana L. |
Ghaypat |
Amaryllidaceae |
13 |
Allum sativum L. |
Lasun |
Liliaceae |
14 |
Aloe vera L. |
Korphad |
Liliaceae |
15 |
Annona squamosa L. |
Sitaphal |
Annonaceae |
16 |
Anthocephalus cadamba Phgn. |
Kadamb |
Rubiaceae |
17 |
Asparagus racemosus Willd |
Shatavari |
Liliacea |
18 |
Barleria prionitis Linn |
Vajradanti |
Acanthaceae |
19 |
Boerhaevia diffusa L. |
Punarnava |
Nyctaginaceae |
20 |
Bryophyllum calcynum Kurn. |
Panphuti |
Crassulaceae |
21 |
Butea frondosa |
Palasa |
Fabaceae |
22 |
Caesalpinia bonducella |
Sagargota |
Caesalpiniaceae |
23 |
Calotropis gigantea |
Rui Mothi |
Asclepiadaceae |
24 |
Calotropis procera |
Rui |
Asclepiadaceae |
25 |
Canna indica |
Kardal |
Cannaceae |
26 |
Cassia fistula |
Bahava |
Caesalpiniaceae |
27 |
Celastrus paniculata Willd. |
Maalkaanguni |
Celastraceae |
28 |
Centella asiatica L. |
Braambhi |
Umbelliferae |
29 |
Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blum |
Daalchini |
Lauraceae |
30 |
Citrus limoni L. |
Nimbu |
Rutaceae |
31 |
Clitorea terntea L. |
Gokarna |
Fabaceae |
32 |
Crinum asiaticum L. |
Nag Davana |
Amaryllidaceae |
33 |
Curcuma longa L. |
Halad |
Scitaminae |
34 |
Cymbopogon citratus |
Gavati Chaha |
Poaceae |
35 |
Embelia ribes |
Wavding |
Myrsinaceae |
36 |
Feronia limonia |
Kavath |
Rutaceae |
37 |
Ficus racemosa |
Umbar |
Moraceae |
38 |
Garcinia indica |
Kokam Tree |
Guttiferae |
39 |
Gardenia lucida Roxb |
Dikamali |
Rubiaceae |
40 |
Helecteres isora L. |
Muradsheng |
Sterculiaceae |
41 |
Hibiscus rosa- sinensis |
Jaswand |
Malvaceae |
42 |
Hibiscus sabdarifa L. |
Laal Ambadi |
Malvaceae |
43 |
Hiptage benghalensis |
Madhumalati |
Malpighiaceae |
44 |
Jatropha carcass |
Mogali Erand |
Euphorbiaceae |
45 |
Michelia champaca L. |
Sonchafa |
Magnoliaceae |
46 |
Mimosa pudica |
Laajaalu |
Mimosaceae |
47 |
Morus alba L. |
Tuti |
Moraceae |
48 |
Nelumbo nucifera |
Kamal |
Nymphaeaceae |
49 |
Ocimum sanctum |
Tulas |
Lamiaceae |
50 |
Oxalis corniculata |
Ambushi |
Oxalidaceae |
51 |
Phyllanthus emblica |
Avala |
Euphorbiaceae |
52 |
Phyllantuhs distichus |
Ray Avala |
Euphorbiaceae |
53 |
Piper betel L. |
Nagvel |
Piperaceae |
54 |
Plumbago zeylanica L. |
Chitrak |
Plumbaginaceae |
55 |
Plumeria rubra L |
Pandhara Chafa |
Apocynaceae |
56 |
Pongamea pinnata Prer. |
Karanj |
Fabaceae |
57 |
Rauwolfia tetraphylla Bet. |
Wild Snake root |
Apocynaceae |
58 |
Ruta graveolens L |
Satab |
Rutaceae |
59 |
Santalum album L. |
Chandan |
Santalaceae |
60 |
Sapindus laurifolius L. |
Ritha |
Sapindaceae |
61 |
Solanum indicum L. |
Dorli |
Solanaceae |
62 |
Spilanthes acmella Mur. |
Akkal Kadha |
Asteraceae |
63 |
Syzigium cumini L. |
Jambool |
Myrtaceae |
64 |
Terminalia arjuna |
Arjun |
Combretaceae |
65 |
Tinospora cordifolia Mires. |
Gulvel |
Menispermaceae |
66 |
Withania somnifera Dunal. |
Ashwagandha |
Solanaceae |
67 |
Zingiber officinale Rox |
Aale |
Scitaminae |
List of bird species observed in the campus
Sr. No. |
Scientific Name |
Common Name |
1 |
Milvus migrans |
Black kite |
2 |
Passer domesticus |
House sparrow |
3 |
Dicrurus macrocercus |
Black Drongo |
4 |
Corvus splendens |
Common Crow |
5 |
Columba livia |
Rock pigeon |
6 |
Halcyon smyrnensis |
white-throated kingfisher |
7 |
Acridotheres tristis |
common myna |
8 |
Merops orientalis |
green bee-eater |
9 |
Psittacula krameri |
rose-ringed parakeet |
10 |
Turdoides caudata |
common babbler |
11 |
Centropus sinensis |
crow pheasant |
4.4 Waste Management
The committee constituted by the Union Ministry of Urban Development (1998 - 2000) had reported that “Solid Waste Management has been one of the neglected areas of urban management activities in India. By and large, in cities and towns; hardly 50% of the solid waste generated is collected, transported and disposed off, giving rise to unhygienic conditions and diseases, especially amongst the urban poor who constitute about 35% of the urban population.” Even after 15 years of this report, the solid waste management systems in India are still the same.
World Health Organization (WHO) has observed that 22 types of diseases can be prevented/ controlled in India by improving Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) system. The Planning Commission Task Force (2014) identifies that “principal reasons for the prevailing unhygienic conditions in our cities is the casual attitude of the citizens as well as the municipal authorities towards managing solid waste, lack of priority to this essential service, inadequate and inappropriate institutional structure, lack of technical know how and paucity of financial resources”.
4.4.1 Municipal Solid Waste
Based on the total population of the campus the Municipal Solid Waste is calculated. Table no.13 shows total quantity of MSW generated on the campus per day.
MSW generated on the campus per day
Sr. No. |
Area Type |
Expected population |
Organic Waste (kg)/day |
Dry waste (kg)/day |
1 |
Girls Hostel |
320.00 |
64.20 |
51.80 |
2 |
Boys Hostel |
120.00 |
30.13 |
14.38 |
3 |
Canteen |
500.00 |
82.50 |
57.50 |
4 |
All Campus (Students) |
9,028.00 |
345.00 |
235.00 |
5 |
All Campus (Staff) |
422 |
25.02 |
16.38 |
|
Total Population |
10,390.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
546.83 |
370.05 |
|
|
Total Waste (kg)/day |
921.89 |
Observations:
-
The campus has huge potential for incorporating biogas plant of composting for organic / biodegradable wastes.
-
Organic waste from boy’s hostel is given to a piggery which is a good practice.
-
The campus has small pilot scale composting plant viz. Girls hostel (intermittently functional), however a common biogas plant if installed, then cooking gas can be obtained for one of the hostel mess, which in turn will give long term savings on the cooking fuel.
4.4.2 E - Waste
It was observed that the campus has storage a lot of E-waste for last 4 - 5 years which has piled up. It will be useful to discard the e-waste. Table No. 14 shows the approximate quantities that may be disposed off. It is informed that generally a tender procedure is implemented for any scrap material in this case e-waste, it is advised that these e-waste should be disposed off through an authorised e-waste recycler/ vendor duly authorised by Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB).
E-waste for disposal
Sr. No. |
Type of Waste |
Available |
To be discarded (over last 5 years) (assumed) |
Total nos. items to be discarded |
Total weight
(kg) |
1 |
Desktop Computers |
506.00 |
50.60 |
50.60 |
500.94 |
2 |
Projectors |
22.00 |
2.20 |
2.20 |
10.34 |
3 |
Printers |
195.00 |
19.50 |
19.50 |
126.75 |
4 |
Photocopy Machines |
6.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
53.00 |
5 |
Keyboards |
506.00 |
50.60 |
50.60 |
50.60 |
6 |
Mouse |
506.00 |
50.60 |
50.60 |
2.53 |
|
|
|
Total e-waste (kg) |
744.16 |
Other Observations:
-
No segregation of the common garbage in the campus.
-
Most of the times the horticulture waste and other common garbage from the campus is burnt near the parking lot which pose a threat to the environment and the human health.
-
The segregated waste from canteen is handed over to the NMC.
-
Chemical / other hazardous waste (liquid & solid) needs to be disposed as per government norms.
-
Recyclables viz. paper, metal scrap etc. is disposed off / sold out to scrap dealers a tender procedure, however no information is available on the recyclables.
4.5 Air Environment
Air pollution has also become a critical issue in India. Most of the urban conglomerations in India are highly polluted with recent case of Delhi air pollution. In 2014, the World Health Organisation (WHO) had assessed 1,622 cities worldwide for PM2.5 and found that 13 of the 20 cities in India that WHO assessed are with the most polluted air.
The air pollution is mainly caused by vehicle emissions, fuel, industrial activities and coal fired power plants. The WHO further suggests that the vast majority of Indians breathe unsafe air. Air pollution causes asthma which is now soaring, even amongst the children. PM2.5 contributes to cancer and it kills by triggering heart attacks and strokes.
Air quality in the academic institute is very important for health of the students, faculty and staff of the institute. The air pollution sources in the college campus are wind storm, pollen grains, natural dust, vehicular emissions, generators, fires and laboratory fumes etc. All the pollutants were measured by the CPCB installed continuous air monitoring station. The air pollutants monitored on regular basis are Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen as NO2, Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) and Repairable Suspended Particulate Matter (RSPM) etc.
The chief sources of air pollution in the study area are mainly due to continuous vehicular activities and domestic firewood burning, fuel burning etc and natural dust. The major pollutants released in the atmosphere will be PM10, PM2.5. SO2 NOx and CO etc. All the air quality parameters are within standard limits of CPCB, New Delhi, suggesting ambient air quality at K.T.H.M College campus. College has green campus of 39 acres; efforts have been made on to planting more trees on the peripheral boundary of the campus through NSS, NCC students, senior students, teaching and nonteaching staff in college. Hence, the greenery around the institute helps to neutralize whatever carbon and its byproducts generated. The campus has total 67plant species which includes trees, shrubs, herbs and climbers.
Figure 3: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations
Legends:
-
Campus Boundary
-
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Location – which covers an area on 2 km
Observations:
-
The campus adjoins one of the busy road network in Nashik as well as has close proximity to the school and other commercial establishments
-
The campus population (student, staff and others) is very high, which brings in more than 2000 vehicles (including two wheelers and four wheelers) which also contribute to air pollution.
-
Table no. 15 shows air pollution levels within and around the campus. This sampling was carried out on different dates through two weeks time.
-
The observations show all the parameters in the campus are within the NAAQ Standards.
Ambient Air Quality Observations
|
SO2 |
NO2 |
PM10 |
PM2.5 |
CO |
Ozone |
Temp |
Relative Humidity |
|
ug/m3 |
ug/m3 |
ug/m3 |
ug/m3 |
mg/m3 |
ug/m3 |
degree C |
% |
21/02/2017 |
8.27 |
45.68 |
74.04 |
50.92 |
1.21 |
93.88 |
26.46 |
46.68 |
22/02/2017 |
4.19 |
46.57 |
70.76 |
49.73 |
0.87 |
76.40 |
24.47 |
50.40 |
23/02/2017 |
3.32 |
52.46 |
69.17 |
34.77 |
0.81 |
60.27 |
24.05 |
59.10 |
NAAQ Standards |
16.19 |
55.61 |
62.85 |
42.25 |
1.63 |
55.92 |
24.94 |
35.70 |
|
≤ 80 |
≤ 80 |
≤ 100 |
≤ 60 |
≤04 |
≤ 180 |
--- |
--- |
Note:
-
NAAQ standard - National Ambient Air Quality standard.
Figure 4: 24 hourly variation of air pollutants
From the graph and the table above, it can be concluded that the study conducted at K.T.H.M College for air quality shows no instances where pollutants has exceeded the prescribed standards by CPCB.